Yes, because he's an enigma. You never know what you're going to get from him. It was quite interesting, actually, because he had a loan spell at Valencia and they booed him when he came on endearing. He only scored one goal there. He's just a guy that he's. You can't depend on him because you just don't know what you're going to get next. He can be. He can go from the sublime to the ridiculous in the same game. He actually averages, even though he's played very little for Chelsea, because I did a piece about him about two months ago around. Just around the Ajax game, the first one, which, of course he scored the winner, he actually averages a goal around every 90 minutes, which is brilliant. It's what you want from A striker. But the problem is just when you sort of think, oh, he's showing signs of improvement, which I think he has funny enough, under Lampard, I think some of his elements of his all round game has improved. But then when he really needed to step up, which was Manchester City away, he either fell over or was offside or just, just looked completely out of place. And I think it was a damning indictment that Lampard didn't bring him on on Saturday. I think it was, it was the wrong decision. I think if anything, Chelsea played into West Ham's hands by turning, by going to the false nine. But I just think that was quite a damning diamond that he didn't come on. And you know, clearly whenever the transfer ban is lifted, another striker will be top of their priorities.