Yeah, absolutely. And maybe what we didn't anticipate quite so much was that there'll be periods of going up, like the seven wins on the bounce and then periods of inconsistency where they're struggling. I mean, that's what we've been delivered. Maybe we thought there might be a couple of wins followed by a loss rather than these periods of prolonged form one way or the other and maybe we should have seen that coming. The issue here is that when stubborn teams have turned up at Stamford Bridge, they have struggled to break them down. Palace, they found a way of getting through, but that was another scenario where that could have happened. And then Sam obviously exploited it well. Now Bournemouth, I watched Bournemouth the other week and Bournemouth are a counterattacking team. They're not very good when the onus is on them to break teams down. So actually that scenario was ideal for them the weekend and, and they could hit Chelsea on the counter and they could prosper. And as the frustration mounted, you thought more and more, oh, this could go, this could go the wrong way here. The worry for, for me with Bournemouth was that Lampard had even spoken about in his pre match, you know, this has the potential of going like a West Ham. You know, if we don't start moving the ball the right way and yeah, fluid movement and causing them problems, we could struggle to get past them. And that's exactly how the game Played out, to be honest, it might work in his favour, because if the board were wavering about spending money in January, this little run of form against teams that you have to break down actually plays into Lampard's hand, that he's all he's saying about creativity, about attacking flair, about a center forward who can get you 10 goals, that's exactly what Chelsea need now, just to supplement the ranks and give them other options. So actually, he can now go to Marina Granovskaia and say, I need spending in January.